Greenlight · Level 2 auditing

Lesson 6 of 9

Matching the bill to the tariff

The step people skip. It is the step that makes an audit trustworthy.

The short version

You have the right tariff version when every charge on the bill can be rebuilt from it. Until then, nothing you calculate means anything.

It is tempting to skip this. You have the bill, you have the tariff, the rate codes match, so on with the comparison. Skipping it is how people end up presenting a customer with savings that do not exist, from a rate that expired, against charges they misread. Doing it takes twenty minutes and makes everything after it defensible.

Step 1

Take three things off the bill.

Rate code, service period and usage taken from the bill The bill Rate code — GS-2 Service period — 19 Feb to 19 Mar 2024 Usage — 20,455 kWh and 49.5 kW
The service period is the one people forget, and it is the one that decides which version you need.

Step 2

The book has more than one version.

Three tariff versions on the shelf to Dec 2023 2024 to 2025 current
The one on the website today is the current one. Your bill is probably not from today.

Step 3

Pick the version that covers those dates.

Timeline showing which tariff version covers the bill YOUR BILL Jan 2024 Jan 2025 Jan 2026 THE VERSION IN FORCE AT THE TIME
Not the newest. The one that was in force while the meter was running.

Step 4

Give every charge line a home.

Bill lines mapped onto tariff components, one unmatched Bill lines ? Tariff components
A line with nowhere to go means one of three things: wrong version, a rider you have not found, or a charge that should not be there.

Step 5

Rebuild the total, then flag the difference.

Recomputed total compared against the printed total you rebuilt $4,171.18 vs the bill says $4,182.66 GAP $11.48 FLAG IT. DO NOT CALL IT ROUNDING.
Eleven dollars on one bill is nothing. Eleven dollars on forty meters for three years is a finding.

Why small gaps happen

When your rebuilt total is close but not exact, work through these in order. Rounding is the last thing you check, not the first.

  1. Silent pro-rating. The tariff shows a monthly charge. The utility actually bills it by days: $16.27 × 29 ÷ 30 = $15.73. Tariffs very often do not say this in writing — it is simply how they bill. This is the single most common cause.

  2. Tax already inside the rate. Some states publish rates with certain taxes baked in. Adding the tax again double-charges it.

  3. A mid-period rate change. If a new version took effect inside the service period, the bill splits into two blocks at two prices.

  4. A rider you missed. A small unnamed line is usually a rider, and riders are easy to overlook because they live in a separate part of the tariff.

  5. Then, and only then, rounding. Real rounding differences are pennies, not dollars.

Big gaps are a different animal. They mean the wrong tariff version, the wrong rate schedule, a meter multiplier you did not apply, or a genuine billing error by the utility. All four are worth finding.

The one thing to remember

Flag every gap, however small, and let someone decide what it means. Never quietly decide a difference is acceptable. A tiny error that scales across many meters and many months is exactly the kind of finding we exist to catch.

Check yourself

How do you know you have the right tariff version?

When you can rebuild every charge line on the bill from it and land on the printed total, give or take a difference you can explain.

Your rebuilt total is $12 under the bill on a 29-day period. First suspect?

Pro-rating. Check whether the fixed monthly charges were billed by day count rather than as a full month.

You find a charge line that matches nothing in the tariff. What are the three possibilities?

You have the wrong version, there is a rider you have not found, or the utility is charging something it should not.